Two-hose portable cooling systems solve a important design flaw in the original machines
Some technology that costs more currency isn’t necessarily better or improved over their cheaper counterparts.
I l acquired this fairly quickly as I kept upgrading our smartphones year after year.
The iphone manufacturers convince you that the new model is necessary with a handful of more than 2 upgrades over the previous iteration. But time and time again, I found that each new iphone would lose some of the things that I liked about the previous a single. Once I finally realized that these “improvements” are just minimal variations to justify rereleasing the same component at a higher price each consecutive year, I quit upgrading our cell iphones until something happened to make them quit working. These complications abound in other industries as well. Many people will tell you that you need to upgrade your window cooling system to a portable unit if you haven’t already. They see the higher price for portable cooling systems and their ease of use as more than 2 factors proving their superiority over window units. Sadly, this is borderline smoke and mirrors when you compare it to other misleading attempts at marketing. A portable cooling system in its original form is inefficient because it needs to pull cool air from your apartment and use it to cool its internal compressor. Then the air is pushed outside as heat. Window cooling systems already have their compressors outside the window, so this is a self-inflicted design flaw. Two-hose portable cooling systems are better because the air used to cool the compressor is pulled in from outside, however it doesn’t remove their inefficiency completely.